Taxable Fixed Income Q2 2025 Highlights
|
Taxable Fixed Income Q2 2025 Commentary
“In like a lion, out like a lamb” is an apt metaphor for capital markets in the second quarter. On April 2, 2025, the roar of Liberation Day tariffs rattled global markets. However, President Trump subsequently reduced the proposed tariff levels, and markets rebounded strongly. A steady stream of notable headlines followed, including, but not limited to the Moody’s U.S. downgrade, questions about the Federal Reserve’s independence, the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) Act and its impact to the U.S. fiscal deficit, and rising tensions in the Middle East. Despite the deluge of news, the quarter ended with economic and market data seemingly unconcerned with those headlines. Equities posted strong returns during the quarter, while credit performed well as spreads narrowed back to recent lows. Unemployment and inflation data remained steady, and business and consumer sentiment improved from Liberation Day lows. Market predictions shifted to a higher-for-longer Fed stance.
The second quarter showed why interest rate timing is a challenging undertaking. The yield curve inverted further from zero to three years and steepened from three to 30 years as uncertainties regarding Fed rate cuts, inflation, and growth persisted. The next Fed decision is scheduled for July 30, 2025. Investors predict the Fed will not cut rates then, with mixed opinions on whether the Fed cuts rates at all during the third quarter.
Fixed income indexes enjoyed positive total and excess returns during the quarter. Riskier segments of the market outperformed higher-quality indexes as credit spreads narrowed. The Bloomberg Aggregate Index returned 1.2%, while the JPM Leveraged Loan Index returned 2.4% and the Bloomberg High Yield Index returned 3.5%.
Credit issuance was mixed during the quarter despite a lull of deals during the depths of market volatility in April. Investment-grade corporate bond issuance matched last year’s pace, while private label commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) volumes are up 61% year over year. Issuance in several sectors was lower than their record-setting paces of 2024, yet volumes did not crater, and high-quality issuers can continue to access the markets. Volumes of nontraditional asset-backed securities (ABS), high-yield corporate bonds, and loans were down 9%, 15%, and 37%, respectively, year over year.
With narrower spreads, strong fixed income fund flows, and mixed issuance, credit valuations weakened during the quarter. Investment-grade corporate bond “buys” decreased to 8% from 11%, to 27% from 38% for high yield, and to 43% from 45% for loans. Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) remain wholly unattractive, with no 15- or 30-year coupon cohort screening as a “buy.” Away from credits in mainstream indexes, ABS index spreads narrowed, though performance varied by subsector. Higher-quality CMBS spreads narrowed as spreads of BBB-rated multifamily and mixed-use CMBS widened. Spreads on collateralized loan obligation (CLO) debt narrowed further from already tight levels.
As always, there are idiosyncratic opportunities in distinct corners of the credit markets. Investment-grade corporate bonds in interest rate-sensitive industries offer opportunities, and many bonds with short to intermediate durations screen favorably. The corporate loan market continues to offer opportunities across the spectrum of deal sizes. Most high-yield opportunities reside in selective and smaller issuers. Tariffs and fiscal policy uncertainty have also affected several high yield industries’ valuations and created opportunities. Spreads of several ABS subsectors and single-asset, single-borrower (SASB) CMBS property types have moved near their long-term averages.
We continue to avoid certain segments that we believe have enduring credit issues. Emerging market credit remains unappealing to us due to concerns over creditor rights in most countries and its impact on their durability. We find nonagency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) plagued by erratic issuance trends, unattractive valuations, and weak fundamentals.
Credit dynamics are generally healthy, with losses and delinquencies of business loans, consumer debt, and commercial real estate loans generally at manageable levels. Businesses have weathered recent uncertainties well. Default rates are lower across the high-yield market, although the default rate on loans continues to be well above those for bonds. Delinquencies and charge-off rates of business loans at commercial banks have stabilized, and nonaccrual rates of loans held by business development companies (BDCs) crept higher yet remain at manageable levels.
Delinquency rates and charge-offs on consumer loans held at commercial banks increased, yet not to levels that raise concerns about systemic losses that might impact securitizations. While auto loans, bank credit cards, and mortgage delinquencies have only modestly increased, federal student loan payments resumed during the quarter, causing a spike in delinquency rates on student loans. It is questionable whether the resumption of student loan payments will have a spillover effect into other types of consumers’ debt. Strong credit underwriting remains imperative to navigating debts backed by or tied to consumers.
Delinquency rates on commercial real estate varied by sectors and deal structures. Office delinquencies revealed a divergence by deal structure: Office loans in conduits continued to rise, while SASB delinquencies moderated. Multifamily delinquencies increased to recent highs across deal structures. In retail, hotel, and industrial sectors, SASB and conduit delinquency rates converged at similar levels quarter over quarter. Delinquency rates and charge-offs of commercial real estate loans held at commercial banks remain subdued, indicating that market stress has not impacted banks’ credit portfolios to date.
If you could go back in time to last fall, and show an investor this quarter’s headlines, we suspect they would be shocked by the buoyancy of the stock market and rich valuations of credit. We believe that selectivity regarding both valuations and durability are imperative for attaining favorable credit performance moving forward. Complacency may be creeping into some segments of the market, but we remain steadfast in our approach. We maintain attention to factors that underlie an issuer’s durability, such as underwriting standards, financial and operating flexibility, and prudent capital structures. Such an approach helps our clients’ portfolios perform through unpredictable times.
Authors
Index Definition
Ice BofA U.S. Corporate Index tracks the performance of USD denominated investment grade corporate debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market.
Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index represents the corporate bonds in the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, and are USD denominated, investment-grade (rated Baa3 or above by Moody’s), fixed-rate, corporate bonds with maturities of 1 year or more.
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index covers the USD-denominated, investment-grade (rated Baa3 or above by Moody’s), fixed-rate, and taxable areas of the bond market. This is the broadest measure of the taxable U.S. bond market, including most Treasury, agency, corporate, mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and international dollar-denominated issues, all with maturities of 1 year or more.
Uniform Mortgage Backed Security (UMBS) means a single-class MBS backed by fixed-rate mortgage loans on one-to-four unit (single-family) properties issued by either Enterprise which has the same characteristics (such as payment delay, pooling prefixes, and minimum pool submission amounts) regardless of which Enterprise is the issuer.
“Bloomberg®” and the Bloomberg indexes are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the indexes (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by Brown Brothers Harriman & Co (BBH). Bloomberg is not affiliated with BBH, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend the BBH Strategy. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of any data or information relating to the fund.
The Indexes are not available for direct investment.
Risks
Investing in the bond market is subject to certain risks including market, interest-rate, issuer, credit, maturity, call and inflation risk; investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed.
Asset-Backed Securities (“ABS”) are subject to risks due to defaults by the borrowers; failure of the issuer or servicer to perform; the variability in cash flows due to amortization or acceleration features; changes in interest rates which may influence the prepayments of the underlying securities; misrepresentation of asset quality, value or inadequate controls over disbursements and receipts; and the ABS being structured in ways that give certain investors less credit risk protection than others.
Brown Brothers Harriman Investment Management (“IM”), a division of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co (“BBH”), claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). GIPS® is a registered trademark of CFA Institute. CFA Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content contained herein.
To receive additional information regarding IM, including a GIPS Composite Report for the strategy, contact John W. Ackler at 212 493-8247 or via email at john.ackler@bbh.com.
Basis point is a unit that is equal to 1/100th of 1% and is used to denote the change in price or yield of a financial instrument.
Traditional ABS include prime auto backed loans, credit cards and student loans (FFELP). Non-traditional ABS include ABS backed by other collateral types.
Issuers with credit ratings of AA or better are considered to be of high credit quality, with little risk of issuer failure. Issuers with credit ratings of BBB or better are considered to be of good credit quality, with adequate capacity to meet financial commitments. Issuers with credit ratings below BBB are considered speculative in nature and are vulnerable to the possibility of issuer failure or business interruption. High yield bonds, commonly known as junk bonds, are subject to a high level of credit and market risks.
Opinions, forecasts, and discussions about investment strategies represent the author’s views as of the date of this commentary and are subject to change without notice. References to specific securities, asset classes, and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be and should not be interpreted as recommendations. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH”) may be used as a generic term to reference the company as a whole and/or its various subsidiaries generally. This material and any products or services may be issued or provided in multiple jurisdictions by duly authorized and regulated subsidiaries. This material is for general information and reference purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice and is not intended as an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy securities, services or investment products. Any reference to tax matters is not intended to be used, and may not be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or other applicable tax regimes, or for promotion, marketing or recommendation to third parties. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed, and reliance should not be placed on the information presented. This material may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted, or any of the content disclosed to third parties, without the permission of BBH. All trademarks and service marks included are the property of BBH or their respective owners. © Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 2025. All rights reserved. Not FDIC Insured | No Bank Guarantee | May Lose Money
Not FDIC Insured No Bank Guarantee May Lose Money
IM-16847-2025-07-10 Exp. Date 10/31/2025