MiFID II: Fragmented EU Distribution Rules Bubble Up Again

May 11, 2020

A lot of water has passed under the bridge since the Markets In Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) was implemented at the start of 2018. The sheer scale and scope of MiFID II implementation sent shockwaves across the EU’s capital markets, and further afield as its extraterritorial impacts like research unbundling took hold globally. MiFID remains high on the agenda of most asset managers operating in Europe. There are a number of MIFID related consultations currently under review such as integration of ESG factors and the third country equivalence regime.  In fact, just last week, the European Securities and Markets Association (ESMA) also issued a reminder of their MIFID II obligations relating to retail investors, amid increased transactional volumes created by the COVID-19 crisis.   

Just two years on from its go live date, EU policymakers have reopened the book on MiFID II with a wide-ranging public consultation focused on specific areas and garnering industry feedback on how those areas have functioned thus far. The consultation poses 94 questions across a gamut of areas including research unbundling, trading requirements, and more — topics we will certainly revisit in time. 

One area that demands closer scrutiny now, however, relates to the sales, marketing, and distribution requirements of MiFID II. Once again, this consultation is likely to flag that there remains much to be done in terms of rule harmonization before a truly pan-EU digital funds marketplace comes into being. 


Upon its implementation, MiFID II imposed stringent criteria on the types of products that could (and could not) be sold to EU investors through its product governance rules. MiFID II’s suitability assessments, defined target market, and so called “Know Your Distributor” rules set a high and complex bar for the sale of financial products across the EU. Fragmented distribution regulations have long been a thorn in the side of regulators and asset managers alike – MiFID II is no different. Indeed, European Securities Markets Authority (ESMA) have previously assessed barriers to cross border distribution of UCITS and Alternative Investment Fund Manager Directive (AIFMD) funds with a view to imposing a more harmonized ruleset, a topic which ESMA returns to as one area of focus within this MiFID review. While there are some specifics like simplification of the product governance rules and a heightened focus on inducement rules, once more, the broader issue of cross-border distribution barriers will likely to be the area of keenest focus once more. 

Despite more than a decade of rule revisions and consultation, the EU cross-border market is still rife with “gold plated” national requirements. These requirements   create rule fragmentation which fly directly in the face of pan-EU regulations such as MiFID, UCITS, and PRIIPS. As such, asset managers, distributors, and their funds can often be subject to multiple layers of regulation when they sell product on a cross-border basis. Such rules often include additional documents, marketing restrictions, or appointment of local agents which must be adhered to on top of the EU wide rules. Fragmentation and duplication result in additional barriers as complexity, confusion, and ultimately costs increase, while investor access, understanding, and participation in funds decrease. 

No More Paper?

Another consequence of the national level gold plating rule is the reduced opportunity to conduct a digital sales strategy. Given COVID-19 lockdowns and a natural reduction in face-to-face meetings for the foreseeable future, this is not a moot point. The EU funds marketplace is still largely reliant on physical face-to-face meetings and interactions between investors and their banks, brokers, and financial advisors. To foster increased financial inclusion and participation, there has been a long-held industry desire to move to a more digital method of marketing communication, sales, and engagement with investors. The current pandemic makes that imperative even more important. 

A digital sales strategy is highly predicated on providing standard uniform documents and data to online investors wherever they reside.

Another key focus area will be is the move away from paper to digital documents. Currently, investors must be provided certain disclosure documents via a “durable medium.”  The current default durable medium is paper. Amid a general push toward sustainability, the industry has been strongly advocating for a shift to online digital documents. What’s more, there is a general desire among those in the industry to move towards a digitally calibrated funds sales model, which requires a ruleset that accommodates and encourages the adoption of virtual advice, online accounts, and mobile apps to deliver investors the required information. This move would align with   EU policymakers’ own ESG/sustainability and digital economy policy goals. Rule harmonization across EU member states is a key cornerstone of a digital economy and is an area that ESMA are sure to review closely in this consultation and beyond. 

Inducement Ban?

The other focal point of the consultation relates to inducements. Inducements under MiFID II are any fees, commissions, or non-monetary benefits that may be accrued by product providers and their distributors for sales of products. There are rules in place to ensure that incentives to promote and sell particular products are appropriate to the investors needs and free from conflicts of interest.

Such inducements continue to play a central role in pan-European distribution. There is still a large swathe of EU investors who access funds through their bank or insurer rather than directly through an independent financial advisor. There is an ongoing debate about the requirement for a simplified and harmonized cost disclosure regime which spans MiFID, UCITS and other areas like PRIIPS. Today, it is onerous for investors to easily identify and compare inducements such as commissions paid to distributors against overall product costs under the various regimes. 

Additionally, the definition of “inducement” is not aligned across the respective EU rulesets (UCITS, MIFID, PRIIPS etc).  There is a complexity to the MiFID rule regarding quality enhancement and best interest tests as well as which products are deemed independent. Simplification and certainty of definition would be a leap forward as currently it is hard to decipher what does and doesn’t represent an inducement.  

The prospect of an outright ban on inducements across the entire EU is raised once more in the consultation. The UK and the Netherlands are two markets who have previously imposed outright bans on inducements. An outright ban, however, was initially resisted in MiFID II and is likely to be once more. Using the cases of the UK, outright inducement bans such as imposed in UK’s Retail Distribution Review (RDR) do not improve investor access to investment advice and may result in an advice gap whereby investors (usually those with smaller portfolios whom would benefit from such advice) are either unable to access it (because it is no longer economic for advisers to service the market) or unable or unwilling to pay for it. Thus, outright inducement bans reduce participation in financial products which runs counter to the regulatory goal. There are also many EU markets who simply do not have a deep independent financial advisory market, leaving some investors with no choice if they can’t access services through their bank or insurer. 

Bottom line

What is clear is that the industry must ensure that investors maintain access to a broad range of suitable products at the right price. Retention of a diverse range of distribution models from full to partial advice through to execution-only is optimal for investors. Retention of inducements is possible if regulators maintain other requirements such as suitability assessments, managing conflicts, and enhancing transparency of inducements. 

 After just two years of going live, this behemoth regulation is once more open to change. Here we have outlined the impacts to asset managers in terms of sales and distribution.  However, since the thorny issues of research unbundling and creation of an EU consolidated tape are also up for debate, it seems like once more MiFID II is high on the asset management agenda for 2020. 

DISCLAIMER: The positions expressed in this material are a general guide to the views of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates (BBH) and are intended for informational purposes only.  The opinions stated are a reflection of BBH’s best judgment at the time of publication and BBH disclaims any obligation to update or alter these views as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. This material should not be construed as research or as investment legal or tax advice, nor should it be considered information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. By selecting a link, you will leave BBH’s Regulatory Blog. Any link is provided for informational purposes only.  BBH is not responsible for the content within linked site and no endorsement of its content is implied.  BBH is not affiliated with site of third parties and no endorsement of their content is implied. The positions expressed in this material are those of the author and may or may not be consistent with the views of BBH.  Information contained herein is based upon various sources believed to be reliable and are subject to change without notice.  Furthermore, these positions are not intended to predict or guarantee future performance. This publication is provided by Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and its subsidiaries (BBH) to recipients, who are classified as Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties if in the European Economic Area (EEA), solely for informational purposes. This does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice and is not intended as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy securities or investment products.  Any reference to tax matters is not intended to be used, and may not be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or for promotion, marketing or recommendation to third parties. This information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable that are available upon request. This material does not comprise an offer of services. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Unauthorized use or distribution without the prior written permission of BBH is prohibited. This publication is approved for distribution in member states of the EEA by Brown Brothers Harriman Investor Services Limited, authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). BBH is a service mark of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., registered in the United States and other countries. © Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 2020.  All rights reserved.

This browser is not fully supported by our public website and may not display or function as expected for this reason. Please note, the Infuse Portal and BBH client applications fully support the IE 11 browser.

Important Information for Non-U.S. Residents

You are required to read the following important information, which, in conjunction with the Terms and Conditions, governs your use of this website. Your use of this website and its contents constitute your acceptance of this information and those Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree with this information and the Terms and Conditions, you should immediately cease use of this website. The contents of this website have not been prepared for the benefit of investors outside of the United States. This website is not intended as a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services for any investor who resides in a jurisdiction other than the United States1. As a general matter, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and its subsidiaries (“BBH”) is not licensed or registered to solicit prospective investors and offer investment advisory services in jurisdictions outside of the United States. The information on this website is not intended to be distributed to, directed at or used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access the website.  Under certain circumstances, BBH may provide services to investors located outside of the United States in accordance with applicable law. The conditions under which such services may be provided will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis by BBH. BBH will only accept investors from such jurisdictions or countries where it has made a determination that such an arrangement or relationship is permissible under the laws of that jurisdiction or country. The existence of this website is not intended to be a substitute for the type of analysis described above and is not intended as a solicitation of or recommendation to any prospective investor, including those located outside of the United States. Certain BBH products or services may not be available in certain jurisdictions. By choosing to access this website from any location other than the United States, you accept full responsibility for compliance with all local laws. The website contains content that has been obtained from sources that BBH believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, BBH cannot guarantee the accuracy of such content, assure its completeness, or warrant that such information will not be changed. The content contained herein is current as of the date of issuance and is subject to change without notice. The website’s content does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. There is no guarantee that any investment objectives, expectations, targets described in this website or the  performance or profitability of any investment will be achieved. You understand that investing in securities and other financial instruments involves risks that may affect the value of the securities and may result in losses, including the potential loss of the principal invested, and you assume and are able to bear all such risks.  In no event shall BBH or any other affiliated party be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, lost profits, loss of business or data, or punitive damages arising out of your use of this website. By clicking accept, you confirm that you accept  to the above Important Information along with Terms and Conditions.

1BBH sponsors UCITS Funds registered in Luxembourg, in certain jurisdictions. For information on those funds, please see bbhluxembourgfunds.com

captcha image

Type in the word seen on the picture

I am a current investor in another jurisdiction