Gensler Sits Down to a Full Plate

We explain some of the top issues likely to ensure Mr. Gensler doesn’t get a whole lot of a “honeymoon period” when he takes his seat at the head of the SEC table. One thing is for certain, he starts his tenure with a full plate.

We previously underscored the regulatory focus areas the Biden administration would likely bring to bear. At the time, we flagged Gary Gensler as the most likely successor to Jay Clayton’s chair at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Last week by a vote of 53 to 45, Gensler was approved by the U.S. Senate to be the new SEC chairman. Much has been written about Gensler’s elevation to the position since his initial nomination. This is due in no small part to the fact that Gensler is a known quantity to the U.S. asset management industry. He was previously head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) under the Obama administration. In this CFTC role, he built a reputation as a hardnosed policymaker, implementing comprehensive reforms to the U.S. derivatives markets as part of the Dodd-Frank reforms and being a driving force behind significant enforcement actions around the LIBOR manipulation cases at the time.

Here we take a whistle-stop tour of the top issues likely to ensure Mr. Gensler doesn’t get a whole lot of a “honeymoon period” when he takes his seat at the head of the SEC table. One thing is for certain, he starts his tenure with a full plate. Beyond the “business as usual” examination priorities recently published, here are seven specific areas likely to come up for consideration early in his tenure:

1. GameStop Fallout

The GameStop trading frenzy and other so called “meme” stocks continue to be high profile and much discussed. The event highlights the challenges of increased direct retail participation in the investment markets and the impact of relatively new methods of communicating on markets, such as social media and use of sales devices, like gamification of trading. The event was multi-faceted with regulatory considerations ranging from short selling transparency to appropriate trade settlement cycles from payment for order flows, to market manipulation and how to properly account for securities information channeled through unregulated forums such as online and social media accounts. The event merited a congressional hearing with all the main characters of the story being asked about it, but it seems certain the GameStop fallout and associated issues remain unfinished and we will likely see Gensler and the SEC return to the case study to pick through its bones in the near future.

2. SPAC Boom

The past year has seen a surge in the popularity of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) in the United States. To the uninitiated, SPACs are formed to raise money through an initial public offering (IPO) to buy another target company. At the time of the SPAC IPOs, the SPAC has no existing business operations or may not even have a specific target company in mind for acquisition. SPACs usually have two years to complete an acquisition or they must return their funds to investors. According to SPACinsider.com 564 SPACs have launched in the U.S. already in 2021, already double the number in 2020. This rapid and exponential growth has not gone unnoticed at the SEC. In fact, the agency has released several regulatory releases on different aspects of SPACs:

Rapid growth of new innovative product involving retail investors tends to pique the interest of regulators. It is very likely that on Gensler’s watch we will see both exam and investigatory activity along with a more comprehensive and joined up approach on how to address investor protection aspects comprehensively within SPAC issuances in the coming months.

3. ESG and Climate Change

While the SEC awaits it new Chair to be approved and take his new position, they have continued to carry out their mission. One of the very obvious areas that the SEC are looking to pro-actively address is the issue of ESG. Under acting Chair Alison Herron Lee who has been very vocal in advocating for SEC action in addressing the apparent regulatory vacuum in the U.S. on the issue of climate change and ESG regulation, the SEC has started to mobilize around the topic of ESG flagging aspects such as investor disclosures and proxy voting responsibilities with regards to ESG as key areas in several recent speeches. The SEC launched a task force within the regulator’s Division of Enforcement. The SEC also recently issued a risk alert to highlight to investors the potential misleading statements found during recent examinations of investment companies that offer environmental, social, and governance (ESG) products and services.

Indeed, ESG was a topic covered extensively within Gensler’s congressional confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee where he said “Increasingly, investors really want to see – tens of trillion of dollars in assets behind it – climate risk disclosure. Issuers would benefit from such guidance. So, I think through good economic analysis, working with the staff, putting out to the public to get public feedback that is something the commission, if I’m confirmed, would work on.”

While Europe has to date been the epicenter of the ESG regulatory debate with SFDR and other regulations, the SEC appears to want to ensure an adequate and well understood policy baseline on ESG is established also in the U.S. markets, and it seems that ESG is unavoidable and we will continue to see it as a central focus of the SEC on Gensler’s watch.

4. Achegos Consequences

There is nothing like a large high profile blow up to spur regulatory action, and the Archegos case will be of particular interest to Gensler primarily because it involves swaps trading transparency, one of the major elements of his role when he was head of the CFTC. The complication of the Archegos event is that since they registered as a family office, they were exempt from certain registration or Form PF requirements with the SEC because they had less than 15 clients. Family offices can self-elect to report to the SEC through its EDGAR system, but in the case of Archegos they did not report and as such built up large leveraged positions through total return swaps which allowed them to circumvent regulatory reporting requirements on these big stakes.

These family office registration and reporting exemptions are likely to be revisited and tightened under Gensler’s watch. The role of the prime brokers will also come into focus as the event is further reviewed.

5. Regulation Best Interest

  • The SEC’s Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) has bobbed around for a long time now and interacts with the Department of Labor’s standards as well. Reg BI requires that financial advisors and broker-dealers must place the best interests of their customers ahead of their own. It also includes a requirement for the filing of additional paperwork. The client relationship summary, better known as Form CRS, is the primary additional obligation. Under Reg BI, financial advisors and broker-dealers must share versions of the Form CRS with their retail investors. The SEC has already conducted certain market inspections of Reg BI. Through its December 2020 Statement on Recent and Upcoming Regulation BI Examinations once again the SEC highlighted that retail investor protection and ensuring that product costs, suitability, and general duty of care to investors by advisors and broker dealers remain a high priority.

There has been much talk about revisiting Reg BI as it falls short of adopting the so-called Fiduciary standard. In view of competing priorities, it is more likely that the effectiveness of the current rule will be more intensely scrutinized: examinations and subsequent enforcement actions a likely to be ramped up.

6. Bitcoin ETFs

SEC approval of bitcoin ETFs has been an issue which has ebbed and flowed for several years now. In 2018, the SEC rejected nine bitcoin ETF applications and for a while applications like these went into hibernation. The SEC has previously denied requests to create a bitcoin ETF, citing concerns over fraud, adequate custody provisions and excessive price volatility. Proponents suggest that the market has matured to a level where these concerns are not as prevalent. Since the initial applications, a well-functioning bitcoin future market and regulated crypto custodians with insurance have emerged. The first quarter of this year has seen a number of bitcoin applications filed with the SEC and many in the industry see positive signals in the market which might lead to the SEC finally approving the structures. The focus has intensified in the U.S. market with the recent approval of a Canadian bitcoin ETF too.

Much of the recent positive sentiment around Gensler’s elevation as Chair of the SEC has come from the bitcoin and cryptocurrency sector of the market. The excitement lies in the fact that he is generally seen as a crypto advocate, and has recently been lecturing at MIT on cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, distributed ledgers, and smart contracts. He is seen as one of the best and brightest minds on the concepts and how they fit into existing regulatory infrastructure. Along with so called “Crypto Mom” Hester Peirce, the SEC seems to have knowledgeable commissioners who will take such rule changes at their merits. The issue gets a lot of press attention, but there are many competing priorities for the SEC to address, so it is not guaranteed that this issue will be fully resolved once and for all in the short term.

7. Payment for Order Flow

This issue was a central element to the GameStop event and the interaction between Robinhood and retail investors in particular was predicated on the commercial arrangements in place. Robinhood remains very popular with retail investors because of the low-cost commission free trading that it extends to its customers. Many other similar firms charge clients nothing for trading because instead they receive direct payment from broker-dealers to route these retail orders to them, a process known as "payment for order flow." All parties must still work to ensure that the investor receives “best execution” for their trades and also that there is transparency around the arrangements and all conflicts of interest are adequately disclosed.

What is interesting too is that ESMA, the primary European securities regulator, felt compelled to talk about the GameStop event and that it was a cautionary tale which should prompt the E.U. to also look at a plethora of aspects such as zero commission trading, payment for order flow, conflicts of interest, best execution, and inducements within its own MIFID and Market Abuse Directive rules.

There are continued questions stemming from the GameStop event including payment for order flow models and their interaction with best execution standards. It is an area that the SEC and Robinhood have already engaged upon, and an area which undoubtedly will be high on Gensler’s short-term agenda. Appropriate disclosure at a minimum will be an area which will comes under greater scrutiny.

It is unquestionable that regardless of the lack of new rules and regulations, 2021 will remain a vibrant year at the SEC and the other U.S. regulatory agencies.
 

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH”) may be used as a generic term to reference the company as a whole and/or its various subsidiaries generally. This material and any products or services may be issued or provided in multiple jurisdictions by duly authorized and regulated subsidiaries.This material is for general information and reference purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice and is not intended as an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy securities, services or investment products. Any reference to tax matters is not intended to be used, and may not be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or other applicable tax regimes, or for promotion, marketing or recommendation to third parties. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed, and reliance should not be placed on the information presented. This material may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted, or any of the content disclosed to third parties, without the permission of BBH. All trademarks and service marks included are the property of BBH or their respective owners.© Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 2021. All rights reserved. IS-07214-2021-04-15

This browser is not fully supported by our public website and may not display or function as expected for this reason. Please note, the Infuse Portal and BBH client applications fully support the IE 11 browser.

Important Information for Non-U.S. Residents

You are required to read the following important information, which, in conjunction with the Terms and Conditions, governs your use of this website. Your use of this website and its contents constitute your acceptance of this information and those Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree with this information and the Terms and Conditions, you should immediately cease use of this website. The contents of this website have not been prepared for the benefit of investors outside of the United States. This website is not intended as a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services for any investor who resides in a jurisdiction other than the United States1. As a general matter, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and its subsidiaries (“BBH”) is not licensed or registered to solicit prospective investors and offer investment advisory services in jurisdictions outside of the United States. The information on this website is not intended to be distributed to, directed at or used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access the website.  Under certain circumstances, BBH may provide services to investors located outside of the United States in accordance with applicable law. The conditions under which such services may be provided will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis by BBH. BBH will only accept investors from such jurisdictions or countries where it has made a determination that such an arrangement or relationship is permissible under the laws of that jurisdiction or country. The existence of this website is not intended to be a substitute for the type of analysis described above and is not intended as a solicitation of or recommendation to any prospective investor, including those located outside of the United States. Certain BBH products or services may not be available in certain jurisdictions. By choosing to access this website from any location other than the United States, you accept full responsibility for compliance with all local laws. The website contains content that has been obtained from sources that BBH believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, BBH cannot guarantee the accuracy of such content, assure its completeness, or warrant that such information will not be changed. The content contained herein is current as of the date of issuance and is subject to change without notice. The website’s content does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. There is no guarantee that any investment objectives, expectations, targets described in this website or the  performance or profitability of any investment will be achieved. You understand that investing in securities and other financial instruments involves risks that may affect the value of the securities and may result in losses, including the potential loss of the principal invested, and you assume and are able to bear all such risks.  In no event shall BBH or any other affiliated party be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, lost profits, loss of business or data, or punitive damages arising out of your use of this website. By clicking accept, you confirm that you accept  to the above Important Information along with Terms and Conditions.

 
1BBH sponsors UCITS Funds registered in Luxembourg, in certain jurisdictions. For information on those funds, please see bbhluxembourgfunds.com


captcha image

Type in the word seen on the picture

I am a current investor in another jurisdiction