EU Regulators Answer Industry’s PRIIPs Call

November 04, 2019

The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) are a triumvirate of EU regulators representing the securities market, insurance, and banking and collectively oversee the EU financial sector. For several years, the ESAs have been working to frame a suitable investor disclosure regime in the form of the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) regulation. PRIIPs has been one of the more contentious regulatory rollouts in Europe in recent years. As we have covered before, the area of PRIIPs causing the most debate has been the Key Investor Document (KID). A KID is a mandatory three-page A4 document provided to an investor prior to investment in an EU investment fund, structured product, or insurance product. PRIIPs sets out very prescriptive mandated disclosures as well as methodologies in how to calculate the quantitative disclosures required. 

Despite multiple consultations both prior to and post implementation of PRIIPs, the market is still trying to push the ESAs to address certain problem areas. Earlier this month the ESAs answered the industry’s call in the form of a new consultation paper. The consultation paper not only acknowledges the industry’s feedback and concerns but suggests paths to resolution. The industry has called, and the ESAs appear to have answered. 

Both the level of required information and how certain data points are calculated have been a frustration to both investors and KID providers to date. Performance scenarios and cost methodologies and presentation are two of the more pressing issues the ESAs address in the consultation paper.

Performance Scenarios

The proposed amendments to the performance scenarios clause are arguably the most significant component of the entire consultation. In terms of its thrust and volume, it is the performance scenarios that take up the lion’s share of the consultation paper. Under PRIIPs future product performance expectations, asset managers must provide varying market conditions to prospective investors which is a departure from the age-old practice of disclosing past performance of products.

Use of past performance to extrapolate future performance has two obvious downsides:

  1. it assumes that the future will replicate the past
  2. investor expectations regarding future performance may be wholly under or over stated as actual market conditions vary from the modeled conditions

Managers argued throughout the PRIIPs process that when a product has experienced high returns over the previous five years, it is more likely that it will experience lower returns in the next five years. This phenomenon is known as pro-cyclicity. The current methodology however suggests what has happened in the past will continue into the future.

The consultation seeks to address this by removing the historical growth rate as the key determinant of the expected growth rate in the scenario methodology and replacing it with a calculation. The calculation will be based on the sum of a reference rate common to all asset types as well as an asset specific risk premium to be developed by the EU regulators.

The consultation paper also suggests ways in which the various performance scenarios could be simplified by removing both the stressed and intermediate scenarios from the menu of market conditions. In anticipation of PRIIPs being applicable to UCITS, the consultation paper also proposes retention of past performance information in the KID for certain funds including UCITS, AIFs, and unit linked insurance-based investment products. This is a welcome suggestion to the industry who are long used to disclosing tangible and audited past performance figures to investors rather than portents to an uncertain future. 

Costs Methodologies and Presentation  

The ESA’s consultation paper acknowledged that cost calculation methodology and its presentation has been an issue for product providers since the inception of PRIIPs. In fact, they outline several different components that may be deemed sub-optimal including not well understood terminology and acronyms, unrealistic assumptions, provision of too much information in certain areas, not enough information in others, and inappropriate or unintelligible legends and charts. 

Specifically, the calculation known as “slippage costs,” the difference between the price paid for an asset and the market price that existed at the time of the transaction (arrival price), has been an area of concern. In general, asset managers do not use the arrival price for anything else in their business and so to calculate it for PRIIPs alone, which combined with a separate cost disclosure methodology for MiFID II was a source of great frustration.

The consultation foresees major possible revisions and enhancements including making the costs elements of PRIIPs consistent with MiFID II in terms of cost methodology and disclosure. This would be optimal for all interested parties for consistency and comparative purposes. 

On the slippage issue, the consultation suggests amending the arrival price methodology and moving to a higher-level principles-based approach. The second might be easier for product providers to implement but would lend itself to variability in calculation method that could make comparing product costs more difficult for investors.

UCITS Specific Issues

The consultation paper also importantly discusses application of the KID regime for UCITS funds. This is an important consideration given the scale of UCITS funds in Europe. According to EFAMA’s most recent report, UCITS AUM is over $10 trillion. Currently, UCITS funds have a temporary PRIIPs KID exemption which runs until December 31, 2021. The consultation paper asks the industry whether or not revisions contemplated should be made to existing PRIIPs during 2021 before the expected end of the current UCITS exemption, or would it be better that the proposed amendments be deferred to be aligned with the expected end date of the UCITS exemption. It also asks whether UCITS should provide different investor documents to its retail and professional investors or whether the PRIIPs KID should suffice for all investor types.   

Next Steps

The industry can comment on the consultation paper until January 13, 2020. Thereafter we can expect a review of PRIIPs, including some consumer testing of the revised scenarios and cost disclosures, in the first quarter of 2020 and a submission of final revision proposals to the European Commission will follow shortly afterwards. On this timeline we could reasonably expect the actual revisions to the PRIIPs regime to be concluded within 2021. The question then becomes whether to implement them before or at the UCITS exemption period of December 31, 2021. Time really does fly in financial regulation!

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH”) may be used as a generic term to reference the company as a whole and/or its various subsidiaries generally. This material and any products or services may be issued or provided in multiple jurisdictions by duly authorized and regulated subsidiaries.This material is for general information and reference purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice and is not intended as an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy securities, services or investment products. Any reference to tax matters is not intended to be used, and may not be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or other applicable tax regimes, or for promotion, marketing or recommendation to third parties. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed, and reliance should not be placed on the information presented. This material may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted, or any of the content disclosed to third parties, without the permission of BBH. All trademarks and service marks included are the property of BBH or their respective owners.© Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 2021. All rights reserved.

This browser is not fully supported by our public website and may not display or function as expected for this reason. Please note, the Infuse Portal and BBH client applications fully support the IE 11 browser.

Important Information for Non-U.S. Residents

You are required to read the following important information, which, in conjunction with the Terms and Conditions, governs your use of this website. Your use of this website and its contents constitute your acceptance of this information and those Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree with this information and the Terms and Conditions, you should immediately cease use of this website. The contents of this website have not been prepared for the benefit of investors outside of the United States. This website is not intended as a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services for any investor who resides in a jurisdiction other than the United States1. As a general matter, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and its subsidiaries (“BBH”) is not licensed or registered to solicit prospective investors and offer investment advisory services in jurisdictions outside of the United States. The information on this website is not intended to be distributed to, directed at or used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access the website.  Under certain circumstances, BBH may provide services to investors located outside of the United States in accordance with applicable law. The conditions under which such services may be provided will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis by BBH. BBH will only accept investors from such jurisdictions or countries where it has made a determination that such an arrangement or relationship is permissible under the laws of that jurisdiction or country. The existence of this website is not intended to be a substitute for the type of analysis described above and is not intended as a solicitation of or recommendation to any prospective investor, including those located outside of the United States. Certain BBH products or services may not be available in certain jurisdictions. By choosing to access this website from any location other than the United States, you accept full responsibility for compliance with all local laws. The website contains content that has been obtained from sources that BBH believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, BBH cannot guarantee the accuracy of such content, assure its completeness, or warrant that such information will not be changed. The content contained herein is current as of the date of issuance and is subject to change without notice. The website’s content does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. There is no guarantee that any investment objectives, expectations, targets described in this website or the  performance or profitability of any investment will be achieved. You understand that investing in securities and other financial instruments involves risks that may affect the value of the securities and may result in losses, including the potential loss of the principal invested, and you assume and are able to bear all such risks.  In no event shall BBH or any other affiliated party be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, lost profits, loss of business or data, or punitive damages arising out of your use of this website. By clicking accept, you confirm that you accept  to the above Important Information along with Terms and Conditions.

1BBH sponsors UCITS Funds registered in Luxembourg, in certain jurisdictions. For information on those funds, please see

captcha image

Type in the word seen on the picture

I am a current investor in another jurisdiction