Fund Liquidity: Regulators Pose the “What If” Questions - Part Two

April 14, 2021
In Part Two of our three part series on fund liquidity, we focus specifically on European Money Market Funds.

In part one of our Fund Liquidity blog series, we identified fund liquidity management as a current central tenet of global policymaker policy. It’s the first time that the regulatory spotlight seems to shine with greatest intensity in Europe, where European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) have recently published two significant papers on the topic of fund liquidity management. The first related specifically to E.U. Money Market Funds, and the second outlines ESMA’s findings from its detailed study of the UCITS liquidity landscape.

Here in part 2, we focus on European Money Market Funds.

E.U. Money Market Fund Regulation – Legislative Review

We previously highlighted that in the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission has moved to reframe it’s money market fund rules through a public consultation where they outline ten possible revisions to the regime. Some of the most significant revisions include doing away with stable NAV funds once and for all, imposition of mandatory “capital buffers” to deal with significant redemptions and down markets, and creation of a “emergency insurance fund” paid into in the good times, which could be drawn down to fund redemptions in the bad times.

Money market funds (in Europe and further afield) form a large and important sub-set of the overall E.U. fund landscape and act as a cash management and liquidity tool for a wide range of investors ranging from corporate treasurers, governments, down to retail investors. It’s also inevitable that money market funds come under regulatory scrutiny in the wake of large market volatility event. Global policymaking bodies ranging from International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) to the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have each already weighed in, and now it’s ESMA’s turn.

The ESMA consultation has much in common with the SEC’s in terms of the most consequential reforms and issues that emerged from review of the March data. It acknowledges once more that overall, the funds were largely resilient to the impacts of the market conditions and investor redemptions were met, with no EUMMF having to suspend, apply liquidity fees, or gate their funds as the COVID-19 pandemic struck upending market stability. However, they also observe high levels of outflows in stressed market conditions which helped to highlight certain vulnerabilities in the framework.

EUMMFs have a large footprint and high concentration of ownership in the securities they invest in and they tend to invest in the same or similar securities. The corporate commercial paper (CP) market for example, is heavily concentrated in money market funds. Globally, the CP market is often largely made up of money market fund investment. Adding to the concentration risk is that funds (U.S. & E.U.) tend to invest in the same or very similar securities, resulting in a high degree of portfolio overlap and usually a lot of correlation in terms of market risk. Also, secondary market activity is usually very low since money market securities are normally bought to hold to maturity. These factors together make for a naturally shallow liquidity pool in stressed market conditions and make MMFs particularly vulnerable to symmetric shocks. These overall vulnerabilities lead ESMA to suggest four distinct enhancements for considerations:

1. Changes to the liability side

ESMA identify in much the same way as the SEC have that the prescribed regulatory thresholds relating to NAV deviations or Weekly Liquid Asset (WLA) thresholds often have the unintended consequence of pushing investors to redeem as a fund nears thresholds, which might automatically trigger imposition of a liquidity fee or gating of redemptions. These hard-coded, quantitative regulatory thresholds therefore may result in “equal and opposite” outcomes by increasing redemptions in stressed periods when they were designed to dissuade “dash for cash” redemption pressures. Also, it is interesting that ESMA’s assessment of the March 2020 data indicates that certain funds were reluctant to sell off their most liquid, shortest duration assets, even in the face of high redemption levels for fear of breaching their WLA levels. They might have absorbed losses on the sale other assets, again the exact opposite of the intended outcome.

The other big idea is to demand the application of liquidity management tools such as swing pricing and/or anti-dilution and redemption fees on a mandatory, rather than elective basis.

2. Changes on the asset side

The current rules always require EUMMFs to maintain a fixed level of liquid assets within portfolios, usually a daily and weekly liquid asset amount expressed as a percentage of total net assets. The rigid fixed thresholds are an area ESMA suggests could be more flexible and recognize market dynamics through more exact and risk sensitive modelling. ESMA puts forward a proposed recalibration of the minimum liquidity buffers. The buffers may be based on the funds own liquidity stress testing outputs and might see a greater role for the regulator in working with the fund to calibrate an appropriately flexible buffer thresholds in the best interest of its investors.

3. Reform Types of Funds Available

Perhaps the most consequential proposal is the suggestion for alterations of fund types. Like in the U.S., the elimination of stable NAV MMFs is proffered. The suggestion may be quite radical, considering ESMA opens the consultation by reaffirming that there were no NAV suspensions or gating required last March. ESMA proposes to remove constant net asset value (CNAV) money market funds and limited-volatility funds (LNAV funds) as product options. They also ask for consideration of Public Debt Constant NAV funds and Low Volatility NAV funds to convert to Variable NAV funds.

4. Reforms that are external to MMFs themselves

ESMA asks whether the role of EUMMF sponsor should be modified. Currently, sponsor support is explicitly prohibited for EUMMFs but again, ESMA asks whether greater flexibility and nuance to this prescribed rule is required to reflect market realities more accurately.

In addition, ESMA asks for feedback on changes relating to fund ratings, disclosure of investor categories, stress testing, and the setting up of a liquidity exchange facility (LEF). The LEF to funded by the EUMFs themselves, or asset managers which would act as a central source of liquidity or credit to funds in need at time of crisis. This would mean the creation of a centralized and pre-funded facility for EUMMFs to transact with during a crisis, instead of government and central bank interventions. A similar idea has been proposed in the U.S. consultation. Detractors of the idea will suggest it will make EUMMFs commercially unattractive to all, except the biggest bank owned EUMMFs.

It is clear that policymakers would like industry to be more self-sufficient in managing future crises, so industry feedback to that point specifically will be worth watching. Check back on the blog on Friday for part three, where we will focus on the findings contained in ESMAs report on UCITS fund liquidity management following its common supervisory action conducted last year.

Up Next
Up Next

Fund Liquidity: Regulators Pose the “What If” Questions – Part Three

In the final part of our three part series on fund liquidity, we focus on the recently published report from European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on its study of UCITS liquidity risk management.

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH”) may be used as a generic term to reference the company as a whole and/or its various subsidiaries generally. This material and any products or services may be issued or provided in multiple jurisdictions by duly authorized and regulated subsidiaries.This material is for general information and reference purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice and is not intended as an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy securities, services or investment products. Any reference to tax matters is not intended to be used, and may not be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or other applicable tax regimes, or for promotion, marketing or recommendation to third parties. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed, and reliance should not be placed on the information presented. This material may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted, or any of the content disclosed to third parties, without the permission of BBH. All trademarks and service marks included are the property of BBH or their respective owners.© Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 2021. All rights reserved. IS-07210-2021-04-14

As of June 15, 2022 Internet Explorer 11 is not supported by

Important Information for Non-U.S. Residents

You are required to read the following important information, which, in conjunction with the Terms and Conditions, governs your use of this website. Your use of this website and its contents constitute your acceptance of this information and those Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree with this information and the Terms and Conditions, you should immediately cease use of this website. The contents of this website have not been prepared for the benefit of investors outside of the United States. This website is not intended as a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services for any investor who resides in a jurisdiction other than the United States1. As a general matter, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and its subsidiaries (“BBH”) is not licensed or registered to solicit prospective investors and offer investment advisory services in jurisdictions outside of the United States. The information on this website is not intended to be distributed to, directed at or used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access the website.  Under certain circumstances, BBH may provide services to investors located outside of the United States in accordance with applicable law. The conditions under which such services may be provided will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis by BBH. BBH will only accept investors from such jurisdictions or countries where it has made a determination that such an arrangement or relationship is permissible under the laws of that jurisdiction or country. The existence of this website is not intended to be a substitute for the type of analysis described above and is not intended as a solicitation of or recommendation to any prospective investor, including those located outside of the United States. Certain BBH products or services may not be available in certain jurisdictions. By choosing to access this website from any location other than the United States, you accept full responsibility for compliance with all local laws. The website contains content that has been obtained from sources that BBH believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, BBH cannot guarantee the accuracy of such content, assure its completeness, or warrant that such information will not be changed. The content contained herein is current as of the date of issuance and is subject to change without notice. The website’s content does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. There is no guarantee that any investment objectives, expectations, targets described in this website or the  performance or profitability of any investment will be achieved. You understand that investing in securities and other financial instruments involves risks that may affect the value of the securities and may result in losses, including the potential loss of the principal invested, and you assume and are able to bear all such risks.  In no event shall BBH or any other affiliated party be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, lost profits, loss of business or data, or punitive damages arising out of your use of this website. By clicking accept, you confirm that you accept  to the above Important Information along with Terms and Conditions.

1BBH sponsors UCITS Funds registered in Luxembourg, in certain jurisdictions. For information on those funds, please see

captcha image

Type in the word seen on the picture

I am a current investor in another jurisdiction